Supervisor Holly Mitchell, 2 nd District, asked staff where, if any, cell towers were located in residential areas in the county. County staff suggested a combination of cell tower and small cell facilities, which are usually attached to street lights or street signs. Supervisors had a brief discussion on what might be the best solution to address cell coverage. “But… we also have an interest in making sure that this tower is going to be safe for our kids and our staff.” “We know that on our school campus, if you’re standing out in the yard, you don’t always get service, or it’s spotty, so the school district has an interest in improved service,” said Donna Rose, president of the district governing board at the time. The district also took a position against the proposed project, according to county officials. Ultimately, the governing board passed a resolution that addressed wireless communication facilities. Newhall School District officials acknowledged a need in Stevenson Ranch for improved service back in August 2022, but were unsure whether the tower would accomplish that goal. They also noted that it would improve cell service for Stevenson Ranch Elementary. There were a few comments from residents who favored the proposed project.Īccording to those residents, the tower would improve cell service for daily use and enhance communication in times of an emergency. Her comments were then repeated in some form by other Stevenson Ranch residents. Zuniga reiterated that real estate agents have said property values would “dramatically” decrease, the tower would be a blight on the community, and expressed her health concerns the tower might potentially cause. We on purpose bought our home in a neighborhood without commercial structures.” A sign on Twain Place shows the the proposed sight of a 75 foot communications tower in Stevenson Ranch on Friday, 082622. “I’m against placing the cell tower that will be one block away and in direct line of sight of my home. “I live and own property in Stevenson Ranch since 2002,” said resident Denese Zuniga. More than 30 speakers addressed the Board of Supervisors with a majority of speakers in opposition to the project. The Board of Supervisors, after hearing both the defendant and appellant on the proposed project, received public comment on the issue before discussing the item. SCV Signal News Podcast with Aron Bender.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |